🆚Comparison with Existing Governance Infrastructure

Table 1 provides a comparison reference for understanding Pangea versus other digital and nondigital governance and collaboration systems. This has been highly simplified and put in the context of a governance analysis framework to help understand Pangea’s strengths weaknesses and opportunities.

Risk Assessment and Mitigation



Dependency on Web3 and advanced technologies may lead to challenges in tooling and expertise availability.

Pangea will leverage a range of proven, secure, and modern Internet standards and tooling, as detailed in the Tonomy White Paper. These tools are well-audited in security and privacy, supported by extensive tooling availability. The Tonomy Foundation brings substantial experience in utilising these major toolsets.


The decentralised network architecture and political aspirations might attract targeted security threats.

Pangea will utilise cutting-edge Tonomy technologies like zero-knowledge architecture and advanced cryptography. This is coupled with multi-layered security protocols, regular system audits, and ongoing updates to align with industry standards.

Regulatory Compliance

The evolving landscape of digital currency and governance regulation presents compliance challenges.

Engaging with legal experts and regulatory bodies, Pangea aims to navigate and influence compliance frameworks using its digital commons governance strategy. Its governance portal allows adaptive and participatory policy modifications to respond to regulatory, social, or financial changes quickly.

Adoption and User Engagement:

Achieving and maintaining high levels of citizen adoption and engagement.

The Tonomy Foundation employs an agile, citizen-centric design process with lean feedback cycles for continuous improvement. In case of declining engagement, Pangea will reevaluate its strategies based on market research. Application onboarding and Tonomy’s trust-enhancing technologies like provable democratic voting and autonomous identity control are key strategies for citizen growth and engagement.

Financial Sustainability

Maintaining long-term financial health and viability.

Pangea will diversify revenue streams and practice prudent financial management. The Tonomy software suite’s dual-benefit sales strategy will aid in income generation and ecosystem credibility. Commercial collaborations within Pangea will stimulate an internal market. A reserve fund and flexible Treasury funds will manage financial shortfalls.


Potential challenges in scaling to accommodate a growing citizen base.

Pangea leverages proven technologies that support large citizen numbers and plans for further scalability advancements. Regarding scalability challenges, the focus will be on integrating more efficient technologies and enhancing server capacities.

Backup Systems and Data Recovery

Large-scale system failures or attacks causing data loss and downtime.

Pangea employs Tonomy technologies with built-in redundancy to handle system failures, ensuring system availability. Robust backup systems and data recovery protocols are in place to minimise the impacts of such failures.

CriteriaPangeaUnited NationsWorld Trade OrganizationEthereumGoogle WorkspacesEstonia

Governance Structure

Decentralised,blockchain-based governance with flexibility

Centralised, intergovernmental governance

Centralised, intergovernmental governance

Decentralised, off-chain governance

Centralised, corporate governance

Centralised, e-governance with digital advancements

Participation and Inclusivity

High, with digital citizenship and global access

Low, varies by country participation, no direct participation

Medium, limited to member states participation, no direct participation

Medium, open globally to all technically educated citizens

Low, within corporate or educational organizations that have no governance rights of the platform

Medium, for Estonian citizens and residents only

Transparency and Accountability

High, with blockchain transparency and anonymous social accountability

Medium, formal processes but limited transparency

Medium, formal dispute resolution processes

Medium, with public ledger transparency and open-source development but little to no social accountability

Medium, depends on governance and usage policies

High, with transparent digital processes

Efficiency and Scalability

High, scalable with digital technologies

Medium, challenges with large membership and bureaucracy

Medium, scalability depends on member collaboration

Low, limited by network performance

High, scalable cloud-based infrastucture

High, efficient digital services

Security and Privacy

High, with decentralised architecture advanced cryptography

Medium, depends on member state compliance

Medium, depends on member state compliance

Medium security, but with concerns about smart contract vulnerabilities. Low personal privacy architecture

High, with robust security and privacy standards

Medium, with a focus on e-identity and data protection but centralised data

Economic and Financial Management

High, with integrated transparent blockchain transactions

Medium, subject to member state contributions

Medium, financial management reliant on member contributions

High, transparent transaction records

Low, no integrated currency controls

High, digital financial management systems

Policy Creation and Enforcement

High, self-regulating policies and decentralised enforcement

Medium, policies created by member consensus

Medium, policies formed by member consensus

Medium, through smart contracts but only using financial incentives

Medium, corporate policies and regulations

High, effective digital policy enforcement

Technological Innovation

High, innovative Web3 technologies

Low to Medium, traditional systems with some digital

Low to Medium, traditional systems with some digital

High, leading in blockchain innovations

High, innovative cloud-based technologies

High, pioneer in e-governance technologies

Global Impact and Outreach

Low, currently, with potential for global digital governance

High, significant global impact and outreach

High, significant global trade impact and outreach

High, significant impact on digital economices

High, widespread corporate use and collaboration

Medium, model for digital governance restricted to Estonia

Table 1: Comparison of Governance solutions

Last updated